[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1342075232-29267-3-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 07:40:18 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux-Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 02/16] mm: slub: Optimise the SLUB fast path to avoid pfmemalloc checks
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
This patch removes the check for pfmemalloc from the alloc hotpath and
puts the logic after the election of a new per cpu slab. For a pfmemalloc
page we do not use the fast path but force the use of the slow path which
is also used for the debug case.
This has the side-effect of weakening pfmemalloc processing in the
following way;
1. A process that is allocating for network swap calls __slab_alloc.
pfmemalloc_match is true so the freelist is loaded and c->freelist is
now pointing to a pfmemalloc page.
2. A process that is attempting normal allocations calls slab_alloc,
finds the pfmemalloc page on the freelist and uses it because it did
not check pfmemalloc_match()
The patch allows non-pfmemalloc allocations to use pfmemalloc pages with
the kmalloc slabs being the most vunerable caches on the grounds they
are most likely to have a mix of pfmemalloc and !pfmemalloc requests. A
later patch will still protect the system as processes will get throttled
if the pfmemalloc reserves get depleted but performance will not degrade
as smoothly.
[mgorman@...e.de: Expanded changelog]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
---
mm/slub.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 98fecc2..8e2a2f3 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2287,11 +2287,11 @@ new_slab:
}
page = c->page;
- if (likely(!kmem_cache_debug(s)))
+ if (likely(!kmem_cache_debug(s) && pfmemalloc_match(page, gfpflags)))
goto load_freelist;
/* Only entered in the debug case */
- if (!alloc_debug_processing(s, page, freelist, addr))
+ if (kmem_cache_debug(s) && !alloc_debug_processing(s, page, freelist, addr))
goto new_slab; /* Slab failed checks. Next slab needed */
deactivate_slab(s, page, get_freepointer(s, freelist));
@@ -2343,8 +2343,7 @@ redo:
object = c->freelist;
page = c->page;
- if (unlikely(!object || !node_match(page, node)
- !pfmemalloc_match(page, gfpflags)))
+ if (unlikely(!object || !node_match(page, node)))
object = __slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, node, addr, c);
else {
--
1.7.9.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists