[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZOgquPF1FXo7LBeFOYhheqx+_ENTn6w4qcKGBqeHnvFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:50:46 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...nel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: allow clocks without parents to change rate
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com> wrote:
> This has been fixed in Pawell's patch, "clk: Check parent for NULL in
> clk_change_rate".
Yes, that'll probably work.
A small nitpick though:
I have slightly different semantics, Pawel's patch assigns zero if
parent is NULL, then use that as fallback, whereas I check for the
parent being NULL all the way. I was worried that the old sematics
could change like this:
So here it takes that:
+ if (clk->parent)
+ best_parent_rate = clk->parent->rate;
+
And I was cautious that if this changes the parent rate:
+ clk->ops->set_rate(clk->hw, clk->new_rate, best_parent_rate);
Then this passes the old parent rate to the recalc function:
+ clk->rate = clk->ops->recalc_rate(clk->hw, best_parent_rate);
It has no side-effects on my system but I worried about
others, so I just left the behaviour to re-read the rate from the parent
every time if possible.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists