[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1342102029.28010.3.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:07:09 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: remove useless code in yield_to
On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 14:34 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> From: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> it's impossible to enter else branch if we have set skip_clock_update
> in task_yield_fair(), as yield_to_task_fair() will directly return
> true after invoke task_yield_fair().
It helps if you CC the guy who wrote the code.. I think you're right,
although getting that skip_clock_update crap wrong is annoying.
Mike?
> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 7 -------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 9bb7d28..77c14aa 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -4737,13 +4737,6 @@ again:
> */
> if (preempt && rq != p_rq)
> resched_task(p_rq->curr);
> - } else {
> - /*
> - * We might have set it in task_yield_fair(), but are
> - * not going to schedule(), so don't want to skip
> - * the next update.
> - */
> - rq->skip_clock_update = 0;
> }
>
> out:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists