[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201207121554.03240.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:54:02 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
On Thursday 12 July 2012, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> > Please check this and talk to each other ...
>
> I also noticed the bindings today [1]. They came in via a seperate
> patch (suboptimal) which has no ack by a devicetree maintainer which I'd
> really like to see here, because the bindings look suspicious to me.
> They look like they mostly export register settings which is usually
> questionable since we might want to abstract bindings so they can be
> useful for a number of drivers.
>
> Arnd, since you committed the patches, can you please comment? I'd
> prefer to drop this DT conversion for now, otherwise we might have to
> support this possibly rushed bindings forever? LinusW, what do you
> think?
I've dropped the ux500/dt branch for now. and will wait for a new one
to get submitted as a replacement. There were other things wrong with
the submission that Lee already knows about, so I think it's better
to do this the proper way now.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists