[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyue0ivxx541BSfL1kkL76KZjwPdGc7=6OXcnArKGyxMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 10:11:22 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartmann <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: 3.5-rc6 printk formatting problem during oom-kill.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> I've seen it a few times, always with the soft lockup trace.
I bet it's because you have tons of modules, and the line ends up
being *really* long. And overflows LOG_LINE_MAX. I suspect something
odd happens.
There are tons of odd special cases for LOG_LINE_MAX, and I bet Kay
doesn't see it for the simple reason that he's not totally insane, and
hasn't loaded hundreds of modules.
Kay, I suspect the "continuation line" logic could easily have a rule like
"If the old line is already > 80 characters, do a line break here
and add TAB to the beginning of the new line"
In fact, that could be really nice for things like stack dumps etc -
we wouldn't have to worry about line breaks and crap, if the printk
logic just makes "KERN_CONT" do a line break automatically if it
doesn't fit on the screen.
People who use KERN_CONT don't do it because they *need* things to be
on one line (it's not guaranteed anyway), they do it because they want
the output to be dense and readable. Doing auto-line-break would
actually *help*. And would mean that you never hit the odd
LOG_LINE_MAX cases just because somebody is printing lots of modules.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists