linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 -mm] memcg: prevent from OOM with too many dirty pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120712141343.e1cb7776.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:13:43 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujtisu.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -mm] memcg: prevent from OOM with too many dirty
 pages

On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:05:01 +0200
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz> wrote:

> When we are back to the patch. Is it going into 3.5? I hope so and I
> think it is really worth stable as well. Andrew?

What patch.   "memcg: prevent OOM with too many dirty pages"?

I wasn't planning on 3.5, given the way it's been churning around.  How
about we put it into 3.6 and tag it for a -stable backport, so it gets
a bit of a run in mainline before we inflict it upon -stable users?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/