[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120712191524.135540029@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:32:56 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [ 020/187] cipso: handle CIPSO options correctly when NetLabel is disabled
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
[ Upstream commit 20e2a86485967c385d7c7befc1646e4d1d39362e ]
When NetLabel is not enabled, e.g. CONFIG_NETLABEL=n, and the system
receives a CIPSO tagged packet it is dropped (cipso_v4_validate()
returns non-zero). In most cases this is the correct and desired
behavior, however, in the case where we are simply forwarding the
traffic, e.g. acting as a network bridge, this becomes a problem.
This patch fixes the forwarding problem by providing the basic CIPSO
validation code directly in ip_options_compile() without the need for
the NetLabel or CIPSO code. The new validation code can not perform
any of the CIPSO option label/value verification that
cipso_v4_validate() does, but it can verify the basic CIPSO option
format.
The behavior when NetLabel is enabled is unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
include/net/cipso_ipv4.h | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/include/net/cipso_ipv4.h
+++ b/include/net/cipso_ipv4.h
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
#include <net/netlabel.h>
#include <net/request_sock.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <asm/unaligned.h>
/* known doi values */
#define CIPSO_V4_DOI_UNKNOWN 0x00000000
@@ -285,7 +286,33 @@ static inline int cipso_v4_skbuff_getatt
static inline int cipso_v4_validate(const struct sk_buff *skb,
unsigned char **option)
{
- return -ENOSYS;
+ unsigned char *opt = *option;
+ unsigned char err_offset = 0;
+ u8 opt_len = opt[1];
+ u8 opt_iter;
+
+ if (opt_len < 8) {
+ err_offset = 1;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (get_unaligned_be32(&opt[2]) == 0) {
+ err_offset = 2;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ for (opt_iter = 6; opt_iter < opt_len;) {
+ if (opt[opt_iter + 1] > (opt_len - opt_iter)) {
+ err_offset = opt_iter + 1;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ opt_iter += opt[opt_iter + 1];
+ }
+
+out:
+ *option = opt + err_offset;
+ return err_offset;
+
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NETLABEL */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists