linux-kernel - [ 093/187] clk: fix parent validation in __clk_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120712191531.026731538@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:34:09 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Subject: [ 093/187] clk: fix parent validation in __clk_set_parent()

From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>

commit 863b13271f1608ab3af6f7a371047d9a66693e38 upstream.

The below commit introduced a bug in __clk_set_parent()
which could cause it to *skip* the parent validation
which makes sure the parent passed to the api is a valid
one.

    commit 7975059db572eb47f0fb272a62afeae272a4b209
    Author: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
    Date:   Wed Jun 6 14:41:31 2012 +0530

        clk: Allow late cache allocation for clk->parents

This was identified by the following compiler warning..

    drivers/clk/clk.c: In function '__clk_set_parent':
    drivers/clk/clk.c:1083:5: warning: 'i' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]

.. as reported by Marc Kleine-Budde.

There were various options discussed on how to fix this, one
being initing 'i' to clk->num_parents, but the below approach
was found to be more appropriate as it also makes the 'parent
validation' code simpler to read.

Reported-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/clk/clk.c |   28 +++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -1062,26 +1062,24 @@ static int __clk_set_parent(struct clk *
 
 	old_parent = clk->parent;
 
-	/* find index of new parent clock using cached parent ptrs */
-	if (clk->parents)
-		for (i = 0; i < clk->num_parents; i++)
-			if (clk->parents[i] == parent)
-				break;
-	else
+	if (!clk->parents)
 		clk->parents = kzalloc((sizeof(struct clk*) * clk->num_parents),
 								GFP_KERNEL);
 
 	/*
-	 * find index of new parent clock using string name comparison
-	 * also try to cache the parent to avoid future calls to __clk_lookup
+	 * find index of new parent clock using cached parent ptrs,
+	 * or if not yet cached, use string name comparison and cache
+	 * them now to avoid future calls to __clk_lookup.
 	 */
-	if (i == clk->num_parents)
-		for (i = 0; i < clk->num_parents; i++)
-			if (!strcmp(clk->parent_names[i], parent->name)) {
-				if (clk->parents)
-					clk->parents[i] = __clk_lookup(parent->name);
-				break;
-			}
+	for (i = 0; i < clk->num_parents; i++) {
+		if (clk->parents && clk->parents[i] == parent)
+			break;
+		else if (!strcmp(clk->parent_names[i], parent->name)) {
+			if (clk->parents)
+				clk->parents[i] = __clk_lookup(parent->name);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
 
 	if (i == clk->num_parents) {
 		pr_debug("%s: clock %s is not a possible parent of clock %s\n",


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/