[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120712175040.647309569@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:02:33 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Subject: [ 59/68] x86, cpufeature: Rename X86_FEATURE_DTS to X86_FEATURE_DTHERM
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
commit 4ad33411308596f2f918603509729922a1ec4411 upstream.
It makes sense to label "Digital Thermal Sensor" as "DTS", but
unfortunately the string "dts" was already used for "Debug Store", and
/proc/cpuinfo is a user space ABI.
Therefore, rename this to "dtherm".
This conflict went into mainline via the hwmon tree without any x86
maintainer ack, and without any kind of hint in the subject.
a4659053 x86/hwmon: fix initialization of coretemp
Reported-by: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4FE34BCB.5050305@linux.intel.com
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: drop the coretemp device table change]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c | 2 +-
drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@
#define X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT (7*32+ 4) /* Optimized Xsave */
#define X86_FEATURE_PLN (7*32+ 5) /* Intel Power Limit Notification */
#define X86_FEATURE_PTS (7*32+ 6) /* Intel Package Thermal Status */
-#define X86_FEATURE_DTS (7*32+ 7) /* Digital Thermal Sensor */
+#define X86_FEATURE_DTHERM (7*32+ 7) /* Digital Thermal Sensor */
/* Virtualization flags: Linux defined, word 8 */
#define X86_FEATURE_TPR_SHADOW (8*32+ 0) /* Intel TPR Shadow */
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ void __cpuinit init_scattered_cpuid_feat
const struct cpuid_bit *cb;
static const struct cpuid_bit __cpuinitconst cpuid_bits[] = {
- { X86_FEATURE_DTS, CR_EAX, 0, 0x00000006, 0 },
+ { X86_FEATURE_DTHERM, CR_EAX, 0, 0x00000006, 0 },
{ X86_FEATURE_IDA, CR_EAX, 1, 0x00000006, 0 },
{ X86_FEATURE_ARAT, CR_EAX, 2, 0x00000006, 0 },
{ X86_FEATURE_PLN, CR_EAX, 4, 0x00000006, 0 },
--- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
@@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ static void __cpuinit get_core_online(un
* sensors. We check this bit only, all the early CPUs
* without thermal sensors will be filtered out.
*/
- if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_DTS))
+ if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_DTHERM))
return;
if (!pdev) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists