[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120712235850.GA9614@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 02:58:50 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>
Cc: Andreas Schallenberg <embedded@....net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dominic Eschweiler <eschweiler@...s.uni-frankfurt.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UIO: missing resource mapping
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 01:40:11AM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 02:16:32AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:44:33PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> > > > Looking further at the code, I cannot see where the mem fields are
> > > > being filled at all.
> > > > Which code is supposed to write the struct uio_mem?
> > >
> > > In my opinion, the driver should. However, Michael's idea is to use
> > > /sys/bus/pci/devices/XXXXXresourceX for mapping purposes.
> > >
> > > That is of course also possible, but obviously it leads to confusion.
> > > We already had a long thread about this:
> > >
> > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg73837.html
> > >
> > > Michael, can we change the driver to offer all available PCI BARs in the
> > > normal UIO way? I'm afraid otherwise we'll have the same discussion over
> > > and over again.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Hans
> >
> > My concern was people will ask for more and more stuff that pci
> > sysfs already has.
> > If we do add these is there a way to not duplicate code from pci?
> > Export pci_mmap_resource and use it? Or make the uio attributes
> > softlinks to pci sysfs somehow?
>
> I understand your concern. Of course I'm also not in favor of duplicating
> code, but I don't think there's much overhead. PCI already exports all
> information needed by pci_resource_start(dev, bar) and
> pci_resource_len(dev, bar). Have a look at other UIO PCI drivers like
> uio_cif.c or uio_netx.c to see how it works. It's just a few more lines
> of code to loop through all BARs and add the to info->mem[i].
>
> By the way, the current size of the info->mem[] array was exactly made
> with PCI in mind...
>
> Thanks,
> Hans
Well we also need to check resource type and probably iomem_is_exclusive.
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists