[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1342139517-3451-4-git-send-email-walken@google.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:31:48 -0700
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
To: aarcange@...hat.com, dwmw2@...radead.org, riel@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, daniel.santos@...ox.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 03/12] rbtree: fix incorrect rbtree node insertion in fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
The recently added code to use rbtrees in sysctl did not follow the proper
rbtree interface on insertion - it was calling rb_link_node() which
inserts a new node into the binary tree, but missed the call to
rb_insert_color() which properly balances the rbtree and establishes all
expected rbtree invariants.
I found out about this only because faulty commit also used rb_init_node(),
which I am removing within this patchset. But I think it's an easy mistake
to make, and it makes me wonder if we should change the rbtree API so that
insertions would be done with a single rb_insert() call (even if its
implementation could still inline the rb_link_node() part and call
a private __rb_insert_color function to do the rebalancing).
Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
---
fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
index 33aea86..77602c1a 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
@@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ static int insert_entry(struct ctl_table_header *head, struct ctl_table *entry)
}
rb_link_node(node, parent, p);
+ rb_insert_color(node, &head->parent->root);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.7.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists