linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fork: fix error handling in dup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAC5umyhPUZ_EVuMSFEzw5nYz6+DjkNLCe12Vvkx-9wig7nA+pA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:07:38 +0900
From:	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com>,
	linux-am33-list@...hat.com, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
	Salman Qazi <sqazi@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fork: fix error handling in dup_task()

2012/7/13 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:04:53 +0900
> Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> The function dup_task() may fail at the following function calls in
>> the following order.
>>
>> 0) alloc_task_struct_node()
>> 1) alloc_thread_info_node()
>> 2) arch_dup_task_struct()
>>
>> Error by 0) is not a matter, it can just return.  But error by 1)
>> requires releasing task_struct allocated by 0) before it returns.
>> Likewise, error by 2) requires releasing task_struct and thread_info
>> allocated by 0) and 1).
>>
>> The existing error handling calls free_task_struct() and
>> free_thread_info() which do not only release task_struct and
>> thread_info, but also call architecture specific
>> arch_release_task_struct() and arch_release_thread_info().
>>
>> The problem is that task_struct and thread_info are not fully
>> initialized yet at this point, but arch_release_task_struct() and
>> arch_release_thread_info() are called with them.
>>
>> For example, x86 defines its own arch_release_task_struct() that
>> releases a task_xstate.  If alloc_thread_info_node() fails in
>> dup_task(), arch_release_task_struct() is called with task_struct
>> which is just allocated and filled with garbage in this error handling.
>>
>> This actually happened with tools/testing/fault-injection/failcmd.sh
>>
>>       # env FAILCMD_TYPE=fail_page_alloc \
>>               ./tools/testing/fault-injection/failcmd.sh --times=100 \
>>               --min-order=0 --ignore-gfp-wait=0 \
>>               -- make -C tools/testing/selftests/ run_tests
>>
>> In order to fix this issue, make free_{task_struct,thread_info}() not
>> to call arch_release_{task_struct,thread_info}() and call
>> arch_release_{task_struct,thread_info}() implicitly where needed.
>>
>> Default arch_release_task_struct() and arch_release_thread_info() are
>> defined as empty by default.  So this change only affects the
>> architectures which implement their own arch_release_task_struct() or
>> arch_release_thread_info() as listed below.
>
> This conflicts with Salman's fix (below) which is in linux-next via
> Ingo's tree.
>
> It appears that we should drop Salman's patch altogether and use yours?

Yes.  Salman's patch fixes error handling for x86, sh, and mn10300.
But it doesn't fix for tile.  If tile's arch_release_thread_info() is
called after setup_thread_stack(tsk, orig), it may release original
task's step_state. (tsk->step_state will be cleared by tile's
copy_thread() after dup_task_struct()).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/