[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FFFF434.20906@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 15:41:00 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
S390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Carsten Otte <cotte@...ibm.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
chegu vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>,
"Andrew M. Theurer" <habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, linux390@...ibm.com,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V3 2/3] kvm: Note down when cpu relax intercepted
or pause loop exited
On 07/13/2012 11:43 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 13/07/12 05:35, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>>> maybe define static inline access functions in kvm_host.h that are no-ops
>>> if CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT is not set.
>
> As I already said, can you have a look at using access functions?
Yes. will do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists