[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120713132223.GA10959@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:22:23 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Dominic Eschweiler <eschweiler@...s.uni-frankfurt.de>
Cc: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>,
Andreas Schallenberg <embedded@....net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UIO: missing resource mapping
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:09:15AM +0200, Dominic Eschweiler wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 13.07.2012, 02:16 +0300 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> > My concern was people will ask for more and more stuff that pci
> > sysfs already has.
> > If we do add these is there a way to not duplicate code from pci?
>
> I have some concerns about the placing for the BAR mapping code inside
> the kernel. The point is, that sysfs currently makes it possible to map
> BARs of all card which are handled by any driver. This is fine in case
> of UIO, because it is intended that a user-space program maps BARs, but
> it is also possible to map BARs that are already handle by a kernel
> driver. It i therefore possible to jam the system by confusing sysfs
> entries.
>
> I don't know which implications this has, but I would move the BAR
> mapping capabilities completely to UIO. This should ensure that only
> BARs can be mapped, which are handled by UIO and no other kernel-space
> driver.
Could you give an example of the problem? How do you bind
both UIO and another driver to the same device?
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists