[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50002A76.6000609@igalia.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:02:30 +0200
From: Miguel Gómez <magomez@...lia.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: arnaud.patard@...-net.org, aaro.koskinen@....fi,
dan.carpenter@...cle.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/19 v2] Staging: xgifb: Remove LCDA detection in xgifb_probe().
El 09/07/12 20:39, Greg KH escribió:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 12:40:38PM +0200, Miguel Gómez wrote:
>> The piece of code that checks for LCDA in xgifb_probe() just checks for some
>> register values but doesn't really do anything in response to them (the actions
>> that should be executed are commented).
>> As nothing is really being done, the code can be safely removed.
>
> Are you sure? Some devices (foolish ones that is) need registers read
> to work properly as that is part of their start-up logic. Yeah, it
> doesn't seem to make sense, but hardware designers usually have good
> reasons for doing this type of thing. Or at least they think they do :)
Weird... I didn't expect that some devices might need those reads to
work properly... I'm writing down that comment for the future ;)
> So have you tested the device after this change and it all works
> properly? You do have this device, right?
I have an XGI Z7 card that I use for testing, and it doesn't require
those reads to work properly, despite I don't have a Z9 or Z11 to test.
But according to Aaro's comment, it seems that the patch is safe as
these register reads don't have any effect.
Regards!
--
Miguel Gómez
Igalia - http://www.igalia.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists