linux-kernel - Re: UIO: missing resource mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1342190647.6607.37.camel@blech>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:44:07 +0200
From:	Dominic Eschweiler <eschweiler@...s.uni-frankfurt.de>
To:	"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>
Cc:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Andreas Schallenberg <embedded@....net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UIO: missing resource mapping

Am Freitag, den 13.07.2012, 16:18 +0200 schrieb Hans J. Koch:
> If somebody maps the card's memory through the UIO driver and somebody
> else also maps it using sysfs, that is possible. What happens if both
> write to the same hardware registers is a different topic. Writing a
> driver implies some responsibility, even if it's done in userspace. 

That's true and I would not complain. I'm just saying that there is the
possibility to disturb a kernel driver by mapping memory etc. I think it
is worth to considerate moving the BAR mapping code to UIO. Especially,
when I look at the discussions about what effects mappable DMA memory
can have on the system security. 

-- 
Gruß
  Dominic

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/