lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120713163448.GQ4215@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:34:48 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
Cc:	Yong Shen <yong.shen@...aro.org>,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard@...-net.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] regulator: mc13xxx: Populate selector from
 mc13xxx_fixed_regulator_set_voltage

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:01:14PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:

> Not very sure if we should implement set_voltage callback for fixed voltage.
> ( Other drivers do not implement set_voltage callback for fixed voltage.
> Since the voltage is fixed, implement set_voltage callback seems does not make sense.)

We shouldn't normally implement it.  The fixed voltage driver does so
because it reuses the existing set voltage device tree binding to
specify the voltage it provides but I'd not expect other drivers to need
to do this.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ