linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Made core dump functionality optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1342149765.31095.9.camel@cr0>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:22:45 +0800
From:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To:	Alex Kelly <eshink@...il.com>
Cc:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>,
	Dan Ballard <dan@...dstab.net>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Made core dump functionality optional

On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 13:22 -0700, Alex Kelly wrote:
> Sorry it took me so long to reply to this:
> 
> 1. *Should* I change the option to CONFIG_CORE_DUMP ? I agree with Josh
> that in terms of the existing codebase, either way makes sense, but I'll
> defer to your judgment if you think I should change it.

Yeah, I agree.

> 
> 2. Is there a particular maintainer I should send this to if I hope to get
> it pushed upstream?
> 

I think Andrew Morton will take the patch.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/