[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120713140806.b3d0fda8.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:08:06 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ns: move free_nsproxy() out of do_exit() path
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:48:08 +0300
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
>
> free_nsproxy() is too heavy to be on exit path. Let's free namespaces
> asynchronously to not block exit_group() syscall.
Please be specific, and complete.
Why is it "too heavy"? Where is the time being spent? Is it spent in
D state or is it spent burning CPU cycles? Does the patch simply
offload the work into kernel threads, providing no net gain?
> The patch also fixes bug with free namespace without synchronize_rcu() through
> put_nsproxy().
I just don't understand this description. Please send a new one which
includes all details about the bug, including a description of
the user-visible effects of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists