[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5000ADB7.7060307@vsecurity.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:22:31 -0400
From: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>
To: Stevie Trujillo <stevie.trujillo@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: kptr_restrict: pK-error in SysRq show-all-timers(Q)
On 06/26/2012 05:20 PM, Stevie Trujillo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> if I press ALT+SysRq+Q all the pointers are replaced with "pK-error" like this:
> [23153.208033] .base: pK-error
>
> with echo h > /proc/sysrq-trigger it works:
> [23107.776363] .base: ffff88023e60d540
>
> --
> Stevie Trujillo
The intent behind this behavior was to return "pK-error" in cases where the %pK
format specifier was used in interrupt context, because the CAP_SYSLOG check
wouldn't be meaningful. Clearly this should only apply when kptr_restrict is
actually enabled though.
Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
lib/vsprintf.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index c3f36d41..598a73e 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -1030,7 +1030,8 @@ char *pointer(const char *fmt, char *buf, char *end, void *ptr,
* %pK cannot be used in IRQ context because its test
* for CAP_SYSLOG would be meaningless.
*/
- if (in_irq() || in_serving_softirq() || in_nmi()) {
+ if (kptr_restrict && (in_irq() || in_serving_softirq() ||
+ in_nmi())) {
if (spec.field_width == -1)
spec.field_width = default_width;
return string(buf, end, "pK-error", spec);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists