linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] fs/ufs: stop using write_supers and s

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120712224538.31cb1e18.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2012 22:45:38 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	dedekind1@...il.com
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@...l.ru>,
	Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fs/ufs: stop using write_supers and s_dirt

On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:34:44 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 15:58 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Just fix them up as you go - the code is already a mixture of "right"
> > and "wrong" (a consequence of a lot of it being "wrong") - we might as
> > well tip it further in the "right" direction. 
> 
> Yeah, but I'd say 80% of it has its own "wrong" coding style, so fixing
> it is a separate patch-set. Simply because when I partially fix it,
> there are almost always context lines which upset checkpatch.pl, so I
> would need to fix it all. I can easily clean it up a bit separately,
> just let me know if you want me to do this.

checkpatch does not report on context lines - only on added lines.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/