[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1342284188-19176-4-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 18:43:05 +0200
From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
To: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] arch/arm/mach-netx/xc.c: ensure a consistent return value in error case
From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Typically, the return value desired for the failure of a function with an
integer return value is a negative integer. In these cases, the return
value is sometimes a negative integer and sometimes 0, due to a subsequent
initialization of the return variable within the loop.
Resetting ret to 0 at the end of the function is not necessary because the
return value of xc_patch is either 0 or a negative integer.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
//<smpl>
@r exists@
identifier ret;
position p;
constant C;
expression e1,e3,e4;
statement S;
@@
ret = -C
... when != ret = e3
when any
if@p (...) S
... when any
if (\(ret != 0\|ret < 0\|ret > 0\) || ...) { ... return ...; }
... when != ret = e3
when any
*if@p (...)
{
... when != ret = e4
return ret;
}
//</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
---
If relying on the return value of xc_patch to set ret to 0 is considered
too fragile this part of the patch could be dropped.
arch/arm/mach-netx/xc.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-netx/xc.c b/arch/arm/mach-netx/xc.c
index e4cfb7e..18a98e0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-netx/xc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-netx/xc.c
@@ -149,16 +149,16 @@ int xc_request_firmware(struct xc *x)
x->type = head->type;
x->version = head->version;
- ret = -EINVAL;
-
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
src = fw->data + head->fw_desc[i].ofs;
dst = *(unsigned int *)src;
src += sizeof (unsigned int);
size = head->fw_desc[i].size - sizeof (unsigned int);
- if (xc_check_ptr(x, dst, size))
+ if (xc_check_ptr(x, dst, size)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
goto exit_release_firmware;
+ }
memcpy((void *)io_p2v(dst), src, size);
@@ -169,8 +169,6 @@ int xc_request_firmware(struct xc *x)
goto exit_release_firmware;
}
- ret = 0;
-
exit_release_firmware:
release_firmware(fw);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists