lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 22:44:59 +0200 From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> To: "Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu" <cmahapatra@...com> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, rob.herring@...xeda.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, leed.aguilar@...com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] OMAP: Define TCA6424 max number of possible IRQs On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu <cmahapatra@...com> wrote: > OK, but if your taking this patch through GPIO tree the better if the 4th > patch is taken through it. TCA6424 fails if both the patches are not > present. If the situation is such they should be squashed into one since the point after the first before the second patch is not bisectable. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists