[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120714094434.GB19640@dspnet.fr>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:44:34 +0200
From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>
To: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
Ubuntu Kernel Team <kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com>,
Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org>,
OpenSUSE Kernel Team <opensuse-kernel@...nsuse.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Simplifying kernel configuration for distro issues
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:33:51AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> How about we start cutting down on the options and start saying "a Linux
> system will provide feature x and y - always ...".
> Stuff like (and I'm just pulling random stuff out here) - ASLR, seccomp,
> 250HZ minimum etc etc.. We could cut the KConfig options down to 10% of
> what they are now if we just made a few (hard) choices about some things
> that would always be there that everyone could count on. If people want
> to deviate from the default minimum, sure, let them, but put it under
> *custom*, *embedded*, *specialized distro*, *you know what you are doing*
> menu options.
In number of options the "infrastructure" options are at most 20% of
the total. The other 80% are individual drivers, hardware (like
network cards, serial devices, usb devices, video...) or software
(crypto algorithms, partition formats, codepages, filesystems...).
You're going to have a hard time slashing 90% of that.
OG.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists