[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1207151150150.32033@ionos>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 11:51:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...ell.com>
cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>, mgalbraith@...e.com
Subject: Re: Deadlocks due to per-process plugging
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 10:59 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Fri 13-07-12 16:25:05, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > So the patch below should allow the unplug to take place when blocked
> > > > on mutexes etc.
> > > Thanks for the patch! Mike will give it some testing.
> >
> > I just found out that this patch will explode nicely when the unplug
> > code runs into a contended lock. Then we try to block on that lock and
> > make the rtmutex code unhappy as we are already blocked on something
> > else.
>
> Kinda like so? My x3550 M3 just exploded. Aw poo.
Yep. Would have surprised me if it never triggered.
> > So no, it's not a solution to the problem. Sigh.
> >
> > Can you figure out on which lock the stuck thread which did not unplug
> > due to tsk_is_pi_blocked was blocked?
>
> I'll take a peek.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists