[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5002C03C.2030304@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 16:06:04 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@....ntt.co.jp>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, gleb@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] make KVM PV use apic through APIs
On 07/15/2012 03:56 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> KVM PV EOI optimization overrides eoi_write apic op with its own
> version. at Ingo's suggestion, add an API for this and switch kvm to use
> it, to avoid meddling with core x86 apic driver data structures
> directly.
>
> Ingo, could you please review and let us know whether this
> matches what you had in mind?
>
> This patchset is on top of kvm/next since it touches some
> of the code modified in that tree (and patch 3 reverts a commit
> in that tree). Could x86 some maintainers pls ACK merging this patchset
> through the kvm tree?
>
Looks okay to me.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists