linux-kernel - Re: resurrecting tcphealth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1342336597.3265.10617.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Sun, 15 Jul 2012 09:16:37 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Piotr Sawuk <a9702387@...t.univie.ac.at>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: resurrecting tcphealth

On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 01:43 +0200, Piotr Sawuk wrote:

> oh, and again I recommend the really short although outdated thesis
> 
> [1] https://sacerdoti.org/tcphealth/tcphealth-paper.pdf

A thesis saying SACK are not useful is highly suspect.

Instead of finding why they behave not so good and fix the bugs, just
say "SACK addition to TCP is not critical"

Really ?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/