[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201207161133.16886.jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:33:16 +0300
From: Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Hadar Hen Zion <hadarh@...lanox.co.il>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the infiniband tree
On Thursday 12 July 2012 05:09, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c between commit 6634961c14d3
> ("mlx4: Put physical GID and P_Key table sizes in mlx4_phys_caps struct
> and paravirtualize them") from the infiniband tree and commit
> 0ff1fb654bec ("{NET, IB}/mlx4: Add device managed flow steering firmware
> API") from the net-next tree.
>
> Just context changes (I think). I have fixed it up (see below) and can
> carry the fix as necessary.
Thanks, Stephen!
Ack for IB side.
-Jack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists