[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1207161058550.32033@ionos>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:59:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...ell.com>
cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>, mgalbraith@...e.com
Subject: Re: Deadlocks due to per-process plugging
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 11:14 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 10:59 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > > Can you figure out on which lock the stuck thread which did not unplug
> > > due to tsk_is_pi_blocked was blocked?
> >
> > I'll take a peek.
>
> Sorry for late reply, took a half day away from box. Jan had already
> done the full ext3 IO deadlock analysis:
>
> Again kjournald is waiting for buffer IO on block 4367635 (sector
> 78364838) to finish. Now it is dbench thread 0xffff88026f330e70 which
> has submitted this buffer for IO and is still holding this buffer behind
> its plug (request for sector 78364822..78364846). The dbench thread is
> waiting on j_checkpoint mutex (apparently it has successfully got the
> mutex in the past, checkpointed some buffers, released the mutex and
> hung when trying to acquire it again in the next loop of
> __log_wait_for_space()).
And what's holding j_checkpoint mutex and not making progress?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists