linux-kernel - Re: Deadlocks due to per-process plugging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:59:32 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...ell.com>
cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>, mgalbraith@...e.com
Subject: Re: Deadlocks due to per-process plugging

On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 10:59 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: 
> > On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 11:14 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: 
> > > > On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 10:59 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: 
> > > 
> > > > > Can you figure out on which lock the stuck thread which did not unplug
> > > > > due to tsk_is_pi_blocked was blocked?
> > > > 
> > > > I'll take a peek.
> > > 
> > > Sorry for late reply, took a half day away from box.  Jan had already
> > > done the full ext3 IO deadlock analysis:
> > > 
> > > Again kjournald is waiting for buffer IO on block 4367635 (sector
> > > 78364838) to finish.  Now it is dbench thread 0xffff88026f330e70 which
> > > has submitted this buffer for IO and is still holding this buffer behind
> > > its plug (request for sector 78364822..78364846). The dbench thread is
> > > waiting on j_checkpoint mutex (apparently it has successfully got the
> > > mutex in the past, checkpointed some buffers, released the mutex and
> > > hung when trying to acquire it again in the next loop of
> > > __log_wait_for_space()). 
> > 
> > And what's holding j_checkpoint mutex and not making progress?
> 
> Waiting for wakeup from kjournald.

So kicking the io in __log_wait_for_space()

                spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);

		--> HERE

                mutex_lock(&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex);

should fix the issue, right ?

Thanks,

	tglx
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/