[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1342434030.4717.2.camel@phoenix>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:20:30 +0800
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
loml <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 1/2] regulator: twl: Fix the formula to calculate
vsel and voltage for twl6030ldo
> On Monday 09 July 2012 04:31 PM, Axel Lin wrote:
> > 於 一,2012-07-09 於 11:22 +0800,Axel Lin 提到:
> >> In twl6030ldo_set_voltage, current code use below formula to calculate vsel:
> >> vsel = (min_uV/1000 - 1000)/100 + 1;
> >> This is worng because when min_uV is 1000000 uV, vsel is 1.
> >> It should be 0 in this case.
>
> Why? Do you know of any documentation which states this?
I double check with the datasheet again now.
You are right in this. So we cannot use linear mapping for
twl6030ldo_ops here.
I'm going to send a patch to fix it, I'd appreciate if someone can
review and test it.
> > I found a problem that before commit 3e3d3be79c, the voltage tables were
> > not linear mapping. So why we can convert these voltage mapping table to
> > Voltage(in mV) = 1000mv + 100mv * (vsel - 1)?
> >
> > Did I miss something?
>
> All voltage tables before commit '3e3d3be79c' for twl6030 regulators
> were clearly wrong. They assumed similarity with twl4030 regulators
> which was not right.
Good to know that.
Thanks,
Axel
>
> regards,
> Rajendra
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Axel
> >
> >
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists