[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120716111218.GA4913@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:12:19 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: balbi@...com, joe@...ches.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, wimax@...uxwimax.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, users@...x00.serialmonkey.com,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, johannes@...solutions.net,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] etherdevice: Rename random_ether_addr to
eth_random_addr
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 03:29:01AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:14:38 +0300
>
> > if you're really renaming the function, then this patch alone will break
> > all of the below users. That should all be a single patch, I'm afraid.
>
> It would help if you actually read his patches before saying what they
> might or might not do.
>
> He provides a macro in the first patch that provides the old name,
> and this will get removed at the end.
that's why I put an "if" there. The subject was misleading and I really
couldn't bother going search for the patch on the mail archives.
Anyway, if nothing will be broken then for drivers/usb/gadget/:
Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists