[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50037DC6.6030209@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:34:46 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask: add a few comments of cpumask functions
>
> And the same applies to the other comments. So can you please grab the
> latest linux-next, prepare a fixup patch and also check that the patch
> is complete - not all of your changes have been applied.
>
Thanks for reminder! I just know this rule now. :)
===
>From 7b227fd186f0abc4b5fb1b7b768253d489f1ed56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:52:33 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] cpumask: fix kernel-doc incompatible comments
commit c4549cd0d77 introduced some kernel-doc incompatible comments
format, that make kernel-doc output mess and looks strange. like
the part of man cpumask_subset, the DESCRIPTION part merged into
ARGUMENTS incorrectly:
ARGUMENTS
src1p the first input
src2p the second input Returns 1 if *src1p is a subset of *src2p, else returns 0
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
---
include/linux/cpumask.h | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
index 170c5af..8bf1c27 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -271,7 +271,8 @@ static inline void cpumask_clear_cpu(int cpu, struct cpumask *dstp)
* cpumask_test_cpu - test for a cpu in a cpumask
* @cpu: cpu number (< nr_cpu_ids)
* @cpumask: the cpumask pointer
- * Returns 1 if 'cpu' is set in 'cpumask', else returns 0
+ *
+ * Returns 1 if @cpu is set in @cpumask, else returns 0
*
* No static inline type checking - see Subtlety (1) above.
*/
@@ -282,7 +283,8 @@ static inline void cpumask_clear_cpu(int cpu, struct cpumask *dstp)
* cpumask_test_and_set_cpu - atomically test and set a cpu in a cpumask
* @cpu: cpu number (< nr_cpu_ids)
* @cpumask: the cpumask pointer
- * Returns 1 if 'cpu' is set in old bitmap of 'cpumask', else returns 0
+ *
+ * Returns 1 if @cpu is set in old bitmap of @cpumask, else returns 0
*
* test_and_set_bit wrapper for cpumasks.
*/
@@ -295,7 +297,8 @@ static inline int cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(int cpu, struct cpumask *cpumask)
* cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu - atomically test and clear a cpu in a cpumask
* @cpu: cpu number (< nr_cpu_ids)
* @cpumask: the cpumask pointer
- * Returns 1 if 'cpu' is set in old bitmap of 'cpumask', else returns 0
+ *
+ * Returns 1 if @cpu is set in old bitmap of @cpumask, else returns 0
*
* test_and_clear_bit wrapper for cpumasks.
*/
@@ -327,7 +330,8 @@ static inline void cpumask_clear(struct cpumask *dstp)
* @dstp: the cpumask result
* @src1p: the first input
* @src2p: the second input
- * If *dstp is empty, returns 0, else returns 1
+ *
+ * If *@...p is empty, returns 0, else returns 1
*/
static inline int cpumask_and(struct cpumask *dstp,
const struct cpumask *src1p,
@@ -369,7 +373,8 @@ static inline void cpumask_xor(struct cpumask *dstp,
* @dstp: the cpumask result
* @src1p: the first input
* @src2p: the second input
- * If *dstp is empty, returns 0, else returns 1
+ *
+ * If *@...p is empty, returns 0, else returns 1
*/
static inline int cpumask_andnot(struct cpumask *dstp,
const struct cpumask *src1p,
@@ -419,7 +424,8 @@ static inline bool cpumask_intersects(const struct cpumask *src1p,
* cpumask_subset - (*src1p & ~*src2p) == 0
* @src1p: the first input
* @src2p: the second input
- * Returns 1 if *src1p is a subset of *src2p, else returns 0
+ *
+ * Returns 1 if *@...1p is a subset of *@...2p, else returns 0
*/
static inline int cpumask_subset(const struct cpumask *src1p,
const struct cpumask *src2p)
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists