[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50043CF3.8020903@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 12:10:27 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Srikar <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
S390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Carsten Otte <cotte@...ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, chegu vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>,
"Andrew M. Theurer" <habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, linux390@...ibm.com,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V4 3/3] kvm: Choose better candidate for directed
yield
On 07/16/2012 06:07 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> +{
>> + bool eligible;
>> +
>> + eligible = !vcpu->ple.cpu_relax_intercepted ||
>> + (vcpu->ple.cpu_relax_intercepted&&
>> + vcpu->ple.dy_eligible);
>> +
>> + if (vcpu->ple.cpu_relax_intercepted)
>> + vcpu->ple.dy_eligible = !vcpu->ple.dy_eligible;
>
> Probably should assign 'true', since the previous value is essentially
> random.
I suspect the intended purpose of this conditional is to
flip the eligibility of a vcpu for being selected as a
direct yield target.
In other words, that bit of the code is correct.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists