| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:23:33 +0300 From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com> To: dedekind1@...il.com Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ubi: Fix bad PEBs reserve caclulation Hi Artem, On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:33:57 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com> wrote: > But one more think is the mtd web-site. I've grepped for '1%' and there > are plenty of them. I've changed them all to 2% more or less > mechanically - only cleaned up one section by removing out-of-date > information. Would you please grep for '2%' and review if the > information there is reasonable? Also, would you please add some more > info to this FAQ entry: > > http://linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/ubi.html#L_bad_blocks_exceeded > > Or even better if you could write a separate section for this stuff in > the documentation, then you could remove that FAQ entry completely. Sure, I'll try to do it as well. But it would only make sense after accepting Richard's patchset as well, which suggests configuring per-ubi-device beb limit via the attach ioctl. I didn't had the time to properly review it yet, but IMO it looks more controversial. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2012-July/042803.html Regards, Shmulik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists