[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <500522F4.7090601@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:01:48 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Srikar <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
S390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Carsten Otte <cotte@...ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, chegu vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>,
"Andrew M. Theurer" <habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, linux390@...ibm.com,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V4 2/3] kvm: Note down when cpu relax intercepted
or pause loop exited
On 07/17/2012 01:52 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/16/2012 08:24 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>> So are you saying allow vcpu to spin in non over-commit scenarios? So
>> that we avoid all yield_to etc...
>>
>> ( Or even in some other place where it is useful).
>
> When is yielding useful, if you're not overcommitted?
>
Right. There is no need to do yield_to when run queue has only one task.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists