linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/36] AArch64 Linux kernel port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201207170802.56434.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jul 2012 08:02:55 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/36] AArch64 Linux kernel port

On Tuesday 17 July 2012, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 07/16/2012 08:16 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> >> If an implementation supports AArch32 at EL3 there could be some
> >> physical (or some FPGA config) switch to choose between the two. But
> >> since AArch64 is mandated, I don't see why one would force AArch32 at
> >> EL3 and therefore all lower exception levels (and make a big part of the
> >> processor unused).
> > 
> > Actually I see one ... and I can bet it will happen.
> > 
> > So you create that shiny new ARMv8 compliant CPU, 8 cores, 2GHz. HTC
> > will want to use it with 1GB of RAM... and put around exiting OMAP
> > perihepals.
> 
> But that's why we have Eagle (A15). It's a very capable 32-bit design
> from ARM and far more sensible for such designs. You can easily build
> something with a few A15 clusters in it, as we're already seeing.

Right, I would say that with any CPU core more powerful than this one
or with more than a few of these, you will also have trouble coming
up with workloads that really require the CPU performance but don't
also require a 64 bit virtual address space in either user space
or kernel.

	Arnd

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/