linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sd: do not set changed flag on all unit attention conditions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5005302D.6010805@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:28:13 +0200
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sd: do not set changed flag on all unit attention conditions

Il 17/07/2012 11:11, James Bottomley ha scritto:
> We don't do stuff just because the standards allows it; just the
> opposite: we try to use the smallest implementations from the standards
> we can get away with just because the more things we do, the more
> exceptions and broken devices we come across.

Yes, I realize failing only on specific sense codes as I did it in the
patch is not going to work.  However, the other way round is not
problematic (explicitly allow some sense codes, fail on all others).

Another example is "target operating conditions have changed".  QEMU
cannot report such changes because scsi_error prints a warning (fine)
and then passes the unit attention upwards.  With removable drives, this
has the same problem as resizing.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/