[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120717105016.3ade44d3@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:50:16 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/36] AArch64 Linux kernel port
> Right, I would say that with any CPU core more powerful than this one
> or with more than a few of these, you will also have trouble coming
> up with workloads that really require the CPU performance but don't
> also require a 64 bit virtual address space in either user space
> or kernel.
There are lots of them - soft radio for example can burn near infinite
CPU resource depending upon the amount you are fishing out, but its pure
throughput.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists