[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1342522252.21627.11.camel@bandura>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:50:52 +0200
From: Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@...il.com>,
Josh Hunt <joshhunt00@...il.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: Kerneloops.org defunct?
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 11:02 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > The reporting tool(Abrt) complicated the reporting and kerneloops.org
> > DNS still doesn't associated with the required ip address. ( Arjan? )
> Anton - just talk to the kernel.org maintainers and get oops.kernel.org
> set up somewhere and be done with it.
I like the idea of oops.kernel.org name. I will speak to the folks. I
wanted old dns in order to get(possibly) the reports from the clients
that have old name in configs.
> > - Starting from the Fedora 18 kernel oopses reporting will be
> > configured to send reports unconditionally, straight to the
> > kerneloops.org as it did the original tool.
> > (this, hopefully, will fix the volume of the oopses we are getting.)
> And probably the volume of complaints about spyware. It should be asking
> permission even if "until further notice" is a choice.
Absolutely.
> For some environments this is a major issue. Consider people with ARM or
> x86 prototype machines who are contractually forbidden from revealing a
> lot of data about the systems.
*nod*
thanks!
Anton.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists