| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5004C5E2.1050906@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:54:42 +0900
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
To: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<rientjes@...gle.com>, <liuj97@...il.com>, <len.brown@...el.com>,
<benh@...nel.crashing.org>, <paulus@...ba.org>, <cl@...ux.com>,
<minchan.kim@...il.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/13] memory-hotplug : add physical memory hotplug
code to acpi_memory_device_remove
Hi Wen,
2012/07/17 10:44, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> Hi Wen,
>
> 2012/07/13 12:35, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 07/09/2012 06:24 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
>>> acpi_memory_device_remove() has been prepared to remove physical memory.
>>> But, the function only frees acpi_memory_device currentlry.
>>>
>>> The patch adds following functions into acpi_memory_device_remove():
>>> - offline memory
>>> - remove physical memory (only return -EBUSY)
>>> - free acpi_memory_device
>>>
>>> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
>>> CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
>>> CC: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
>>> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
>>> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
>>> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
>>> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
>>> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>>> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
>>> CC: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> drivers/base/memory.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/memory.h | 5 +++++
>>> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 1 +
>>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 8 ++++++++
>>> 5 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> Index: linux-3.5-rc6/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- linux-3.5-rc6.orig/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c 2012-07-09 18:08:29.946888653 +0900
>>> +++ linux-3.5-rc6/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c 2012-07-09 18:08:43.470719531 +0900
>>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/module.h>
>>> #include <linux/init.h>
>>> #include <linux/types.h>
>>> +#include <linux/memory.h>
>>> #include <linux/memory_hotplug.h>
>>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>>> #include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
>>> @@ -452,12 +453,35 @@ static int acpi_memory_device_add(struct
>>> static int acpi_memory_device_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type)
>>> {
>>> struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device = NULL;
>>> -
>>> + struct acpi_memory_info *info, *tmp;
>>> + int result;
>>> + int node;
>>>
>>> if (!device || !acpi_driver_data(device))
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> mem_device = acpi_driver_data(device);
>>> +
>>> + node = acpi_get_node(mem_device->device->handle);
>>> +
>>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(info, tmp, &mem_device->res_list, list) {
>>> + if (!info->enabled)
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + if (!is_memblk_offline(info->start_addr, info->length)) {
>>> + result = offline_memory(info->start_addr, info->length);
>>> + if (result)
>>> + return result;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + result = remove_memory(node, info->start_addr, info->length);
>>
>> The user may online the memory between offline_memory() and remove_memory().
>> So I think we should lock memory hotplug before check the memory's status
>> and release it after remove_memory().
>
> How about get "mem_block->state_mutex" of removed memory? When offlining
> memory, we need to change "memory_block->state" into "MEM_OFFLINE".
> In this case, we get mem_block->state_mutex. So I think the mutex lock
> is beneficial.
It is not good idea since remove_memory frees mem_block structure...
Do you have any ideas?
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
> Thanks,
> Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Wen Congyang
>>
>>> + if (result)
>>> + return result;
>>> +
>>> + list_del(&info->list);
>>> + kfree(info);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> kfree(mem_device);
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>> Index: linux-3.5-rc6/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- linux-3.5-rc6.orig/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h 2012-07-09 18:08:29.955888542 +0900
>>> +++ linux-3.5-rc6/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h 2012-07-09 18:08:43.471719518 +0900
>>> @@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ static inline int is_mem_section_removab
>>> extern int mem_online_node(int nid);
>>> extern int add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size);
>>> extern int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size);
>>> +extern int remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size);
>>> extern int offline_memory(u64 start, u64 size);
>>> extern int sparse_add_one_section(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
>>> int nr_pages);
>>> Index: linux-3.5-rc6/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- linux-3.5-rc6.orig/mm/memory_hotplug.c 2012-07-09 18:08:29.953888567 +0900
>>> +++ linux-3.5-rc6/mm/memory_hotplug.c 2012-07-09 18:08:43.476719455 +0900
>>> @@ -659,6 +659,14 @@ out:
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(add_memory);
>>>
>>> +int remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
>>> +{
>>> + return -EBUSY;
>>> +
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(remove_memory);
>>> +
>>> +
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
>>> /*
>>> * A free page on the buddy free lists (not the per-cpu lists) has PageBuddy
>>> Index: linux-3.5-rc6/drivers/base/memory.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- linux-3.5-rc6.orig/drivers/base/memory.c 2012-07-09 18:08:29.947888640 +0900
>>> +++ linux-3.5-rc6/drivers/base/memory.c 2012-07-09 18:10:54.880076739 +0900
>>> @@ -70,6 +70,45 @@ void unregister_memory_isolate_notifier(
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_memory_isolate_notifier);
>>>
>>> +bool is_memblk_offline(unsigned long start, unsigned long size)
>>> +{
>>> + struct memory_block *mem = NULL;
>>> + struct mem_section *section;
>>> + unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
>>> + unsigned long pfn, section_nr;
>>> +
>>> + start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(start);
>>> + end_pfn = start_pfn + PFN_DOWN(start);
>>> +
>>> + for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
>>> + section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);
>>> + if (!present_section_nr(section_nr));
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + section = __nr_to_section(section_nr);
>>> + /* same memblock? */
>>> + if (mem)
>>> + if((section_nr >= mem->start_section_nr) &&
>>> + (section_nr <= mem->end_section_nr))
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + mem = find_memory_block_hinted(section, mem);
>>> + if (!mem)
>>> + continue;
>>> + if (mem->state == MEM_OFFLINE)
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + kobject_put(&mem->dev.kobj);
>>> + return false;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (mem)
>>> + kobject_put(&mem->dev.kobj);
>>> +
>>> + return true;
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(is_memblk_offline);
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * register_memory - Setup a sysfs device for a memory block
>>> */
>>> Index: linux-3.5-rc6/include/linux/memory.h
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- linux-3.5-rc6.orig/include/linux/memory.h 2012-07-08 09:23:56.000000000 +0900
>>> +++ linux-3.5-rc6/include/linux/memory.h 2012-07-09 18:08:43.484719355 +0900
>>> @@ -106,6 +106,10 @@ static inline int memory_isolate_notify(
>>> {
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> +static inline bool is_memblk_offline(unsigned long start, unsigned long size)
>>> +{
>>> + return false;
>>> +}
>>> #else
>>> extern int register_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
>>> extern void unregister_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
>>> @@ -120,6 +124,7 @@ extern int memory_isolate_notify(unsigne
>>> extern struct memory_block *find_memory_block_hinted(struct mem_section *,
>>> struct memory_block *);
>>> extern struct memory_block *find_memory_block(struct mem_section *);
>>> +extern bool is_memblk_offline(unsigned long start, unsigned long size);
>>> #define CONFIG_MEM_BLOCK_SIZE (PAGES_PER_SECTION<<PAGE_SHIFT)
>>> enum mem_add_context { BOOT, HOTPLUG };
>>> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE */
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
>> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
>> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
>> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists