[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <500552A0.7020301@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:55:12 -0500
From: "Gabriel M. Beddingfield" <gabrbedd@...il.com>
To: Rajeev kumar <rajeev-dlh.kumar@...com>
CC: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] MFD: twl6040: Fix revision information
On 07/17/2012 01:39 AM, Rajeev kumar wrote:
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c b/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c
>> index a36e9fc..2786de2 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c
>> @@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ int twl6040_get_hs_step_size(struct snd_soc_codec
>> *codec)
>> {
>> struct twl6040 *twl6040 = codec->control_data;
>>
>> - if (twl6040_get_revid(twl6040)< TWL6040_REV_ES1_2)
>> + if (twl6040_get_revid(twl6040)< TWL6040_REV_ES1_3)
>
>
> Instead of doing this change why not you take a #define for revision and
> do
> if (twl6040_get_revid(twl6040)< TWL6040_REV)
I disagree. The driver isn't just for one revision... it's for all of
them. Peter's code is pretty clear as to what the situation is. Your
suggestion hides it.
-gabriel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists