[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120717015710.GA2438@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:57:10 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...il.com>
Cc: Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>,
Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, JBottomley@...allels.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] Fix a dead loop in async_synchronize_full()
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 04:01:33PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de> wrote:
> > Is this still scheduled to go into 3.5? I'm asking because -rc7 has been
> > released and does not contain this fix. W/o this fix, my powerpc system
> > won't boot[0] :-\
>
> I don't expect James is going to push my async changes for 3.5. So
> maybe we should go with Zhong's smaller fix for 3.5 and then replace
> with the ASYNC_DOMAIN patches in 3.6?
Makes sense to me! I have been using Zhong's fix for my testing on
PowerPC for some weeks now with no trouble.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists