[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50056E59.4090003@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 21:53:29 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5/9] KVM: MMU: fask check write-protect for direct mmu
If it have no indirect shadow pages we need not protect any gfn,
this is always true for direct mmu without nested
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 28b12e2..a846a9c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -2294,6 +2294,9 @@ static int mmu_need_write_protect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
struct hlist_node *node;
bool need_unsync = false;
+ if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.indirect_shadow_pages)
+ return 0;
+
for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(vcpu->kvm, s, gfn, node) {
if (!can_unsync)
return 1;
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists