[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAAP30FtFOQSJ8UvN6H+L6qwPyphi27L+mxi-3COu6RAJQTHcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:30:46 -0300
From: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>, cjb@...top.org,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk, ulf.hansson@...ricsson.com,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] gpio: of_get_named_gpio_flags() return
-EPROBE_DEFER if GPIO not yet available
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de> wrote:
>
>> of_get_named_gpio_flags() and of_get_named_gpio() return -EPROBE_DEFER if the
>> respective GPIO is not (yet) available. This is useful if driver's probe()
>> functions try to get a GPIO whose controller isn't probed yet. Thus, the driver
>> can be probed again later on.
>>
>> The function still returns -EINVAL on other errors (parse error or node doesn't
>> exist). This way, the case of an optional/intentionally missing GPIO is handled
>> appropriately.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
>
> Patch applied, if all gpio stuff shall defer properly in v3.6 we need this
> so let's do some testing in -next!
>
> Would be nice to get some ACK besides my own...
You can add mine. I've been using this patch for quite some time now.
Acked-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@...il.com>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists