[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5005B737.1030203@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:04:23 -0700
From: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>
CC: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] 3.0-stable: Fix for leapsecond deadlock & hrtimer/futex
issue
On 07/17/2012 11:26 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> John Stultz wrote:
>
>> Are there any other test suites that folks would recommend I look
>> into for merging these (and other time related) tests?
> Would it be possible to put them in the kernel tree somewhere, for
> example under tools/testing/?
Huh. I guess its possible. However I'd like to avoid starting
yet-another-testing-framework.
The idea of keeping kernel tests close to the code could be nice since
it might avoid the bit-rot many testing suites get where bad tests start
failing and no one cares enough or has the context to sort out fixing
false positives.
But looking at the ltp project page, it seems there have been some good
cleanups in fixing known failures since last I looked (4 or so years
back). So it might be LTP is the proper place for this.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists