linux-kernel - Re: PM: Summary of changes for v3.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201207172252.06093.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jul 2012 22:52:05 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
Cc:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: PM: Summary of changes for v3.6

Hi,

On Tuesday, July 17, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Rafael, Daniel,
> 
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> writes:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > All of the changes I'd like to include into the first PM pull request during
> > the v3.6 merge window, except maybe for one or two patches I know are in the
> > works, is on the 'linux-next' branch of the linux-pm.git tree now.  The summary
> > of those changes is appended.  If anyone finds any of them objectionable,
> > please let me know ASAP.  Also please let me know if you have any power
> > management patches you'd like me to take for v3.6.
> >
> 
> Could someone please clarify the status of the coupled CPUidle series?  
> 
> There's a version of these in Daniels cpuidle-next branch and there's a
> version of these in Len's next branch (included in linux-next), but I'm
> still not entirely sure which branch is going upstream and which branch
> has the latest version (but I think Daniel's is the latest)

Colin says that the commits in the Len's tree match his latest version,
so I think those commits should be merged, since they have been present
in that tree since the 3.5 merge window.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/