[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1342563364.2229.166.camel@bling.home>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:16:04 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: avi@...hat.com, gleb@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jan.kiszka@...mens.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] kvm: Extend irqfd to support level interrupts
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 01:00 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 03:57:41PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 00:26 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 02:33:47PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > @@ -96,6 +183,9 @@ irqfd_shutdown(struct work_struct *work)
> > > > * It is now safe to release the object's resources
> > > > */
> > > > eventfd_ctx_put(irqfd->eventfd);
> > > > +
> > > > + _irq_source_put(irqfd->source);
> > > > +
> > > > kfree(irqfd);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hang on, this is a bug I think. This is done asynchronously. So this
> > > means that I can assign MAX number of irqfds, then close one, and now
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ What is this?
> > Do you mean max irq source ids?
>
> Yes, this is what I meant. Sorry about being unclear.
>
> > > assign will fail because deassign did not get freed.
> > >
> > > Maybe we can solve this by flushing wq before assign?
> > > Looks a bit fragile but may be enough - need to document well.
Why is this fragile? We could even make it part of a retry so we don't
call it unless we need to.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists