[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120717222444.GG24336@google.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:24:44 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vgoyal@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] [PATCH] block: uninitialized ioc->nr_tasks
triggers WARN_ON
Hello, Olof.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 02:36:43PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> It seems like the init of ioc->nr_tasks was removed in that patch,
> so it starts out at 0 instead of 1.
>
> Tejun, is the right thing here to add back the init, or should something else
> be done?
>
> The below patch removes the warning, but I haven't done any more extensive
> testing on it.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Right, the patch shouldn't have replaced the init.
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Fortunately, the effect of the bug is limited. ioc->nr_tasks only
used to veto block cgroup migration if a task has ioc which is shared
by multiple tasks. Currently, the only known program using CLONE_IO
is dump and even if somebody migrates some threads of a single dump
instance to a different block cgroup, the result won't be catastrophic
although block cgroup policies would become ambiguous. IMHO, it
should be okay to route this through -stable after 3.5. Jens?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists