lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13425653961814@kroah.org>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:49:56 -0700
From:	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	johnstul@...ibm.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	john.stultz@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	prarit@...hat.com, richardcochran@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc:	<stable@...r.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ntp: Correct TAI offset during leap second" has been added to the 3.0-stable tree


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ntp: Correct TAI offset during leap second

to the 3.0-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     ntp-correct-tai-offset-during-leap-second.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.0 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@...r.kernel.org> know about it.


>From johnstul@...ibm.com  Tue Jul 17 15:24:12 2012
From: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:33:49 -0400
Subject: ntp: Correct TAI offset during leap second
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Message-ID: <1342546438-17534-3-git-send-email-johnstul@...ibm.com>


From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>

This is a backport of dd48d708ff3e917f6d6b6c2b696c3f18c019feed

When repeating a UTC time value during a leap second (when the UTC
time should be 23:59:60), the TAI timescale should not stop. The kernel
NTP code increments the TAI offset one second too late. This patch fixes
the issue by incrementing the offset during the leap second itself.

Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/time/ntp.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/time/ntp.c
+++ b/kernel/time/ntp.c
@@ -378,6 +378,7 @@ int second_overflow(unsigned long secs)
 		if (secs % 86400 == 0) {
 			leap = -1;
 			time_state = TIME_OOP;
+			time_tai++;
 			printk(KERN_NOTICE
 				"Clock: inserting leap second 23:59:60 UTC\n");
 		}
@@ -392,7 +393,6 @@ int second_overflow(unsigned long secs)
 		}
 		break;
 	case TIME_OOP:
-		time_tai++;
 		time_state = TIME_WAIT;
 		break;
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from johnstul@...ibm.com are

queue-3.0/timekeeping-fix-leapsecond-triggered-load-spike-issue.patch
queue-3.0/time-move-common-updates-to-a-function.patch
queue-3.0/timekeeping-fix-clock_monotonic-inconsistency-during-leapsecond.patch
queue-3.0/hrtimer-update-hrtimer-base-offsets-each-hrtimer_interrupt.patch
queue-3.0/timekeeping-add-missing-update-call-in-timekeeping_resume.patch
queue-3.0/hrtimers-move-lock-held-region-in-hrtimer_interrupt.patch
queue-3.0/hrtimer-provide-clock_was_set_delayed.patch
queue-3.0/ntp-fix-leap-second-hrtimer-livelock.patch
queue-3.0/timekeeping-provide-hrtimer-update-function.patch
queue-3.0/timekeeping-maintain-ktime_t-based-offsets-for-hrtimers.patch
queue-3.0/ntp-correct-tai-offset-during-leap-second.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ